It is simply impossible to prevent the students from displaying their personal taste even in uniforms.

Sex live chating littel-16Sex live chating littel-64

Uniforms may be cheaper than branded or designer clothing, but they are no way cheaper than street clothing.

Thus, if you are not fussy about a particular brand, you can save a lot of money if the school does not insist on uniforms.

A teenager who is fully clad in a school uniform can still disrupt the proceedings if he hurls obscenities at his colleagues and teachers.

By denying students the right to express their personalities, uniforms not only infringe on their constitutional rights, but also inhibit the development of virtues such as diversity and tolerance in the school.

There is a consensus on the fact that bringing in a regulation that mandates uniformity across schools will do little to address the larger issues of drug abuse, gang-wars, robbing, etc.

By using school uniforms as a panacea, its proponents are overlooking the root cause of the problems.Needless to say, this imposes an additional expense on parents.With normal clothing, parents have an option to buy from discount stores, used clothing store, etc., to save a considerable sum.One doesn't need to look any further than Bill Clinton's address itself to understand the hypocritical nature of this argument.To quote a few excerpts from his speech,"Today I'm visiting Long Beach, California, a community that has helped to restore order to its schools by requiring elementary and middle school students to wear uniforms...Uniforms are found only at select stores, with a fixed price, which can be a real pain for low-income families with multiple kids.